Non-traditional effect: how does the LGBT community affect the value of real estate?
Where to look for real estate, which will definitely rise in price in 10–20 years? There are dozens of theories by which analysts are trying to predict price increases in…

Continue reading →

Feast on Olympus: investors are returning to Greece
In the summer of 2017, international rating agencies Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch raised Greece’s credit ratings with a positive outlook. Analysts state: the country's economy is recovering from…

Continue reading →

How to invest in redevelopment in Germany with a small budget?
In recent years, key rates in the EU have dropped to a record low. Bank financing fell in price to 1.5–3% per annum, and with it, the profitability of deposits,…

Continue reading →

Mezzanine loan and equity partnership: pros and cons

Investors can invest in value-added projects (construction or renovation of real estate) in two ways:

– Providing a mezzanine loan (mezzanine financing): the investor gives the developer a loan in exchange for interest on the loan, and sometimes, as an additional incentive, and in exchange for a portion of the project’s profit (equity kicker).

– Equity partnership: the investor provides the developer with equity capital, participates in the project and makes a profit from its implementation.

Each of the two strategies has pros and cons, which the investor in a development project abroad should be aware of.

Read more about Tranio value added projects.

Yield
In case of mezzanine financing, the investor receives interest on the loan. In addition, the lender may claim additional remuneration from the net profit of the project in the form of securities: warrants or options. On average, a mezzanine loan brings the investor an income of 5-10% per annum on invested capital.

The share partner receives a portion of the profits from the project. Its size is determined by a number of factors: the cost of capital in the market, the value of the developer’s investments, the quality and location of the project. On average, an investor can count on 10–20% per annum on invested capital.

Risks
The assessment of the riskiness of the two strategies is related to the turn in which project participants make a profit. The mezzanine investor makes a second profit after the bank, which removes it from the risk of losing the invested capital. For him, it is important how much capital the developer provides, since the latter’s funds protect the mezzanine in the event of a negative scenario.

The equity partner is protected worse: he makes a profit after the mezzanine investor and, if the project is unprofitable, the first after the developer will suffer losses. However, with a share partnership, the profit growth potential is greater, and this scheme will be more profitable if the project is successful.

Flexibility
For an investor, a less flexible mezzanine loan is more reliable: it receives fixed payments in a predetermined time frame. The profit of the equity partner depends entirely on the success of the project, so such flexible conditions may not be in his favor.

At the same time, a mezzanine loan is more flexible financing conditions (regularity of payments, debt repayment, interest rates, loan period) compared with a bank loan and is not always supported by collateral.

Control
The question of investor participation in the project is decided in the negotiation process. As a rule, the equity partner has a greater influence on making key decisions than the mezzanine investor, because he is less protected from the risk of capital loss. The mezzanine investor, in turn, can acquire a representative with the right to vote on the board of directors.

Less flexible, but simpler and more defined (fixed payments and payment terms)

Less defined, but more flexible (payouts depend on cash flow)

Carte Blanche for Investors: Golden Visas in Southern Europe
In 2008, a financial crisis began in Europe. The problems in the economy affected the state of local real estate markets: the volume of investments decreased, real estate prices fell…

...

“Chose for myself”: Tranio's client about investing in Bad Gleichenberg
An apartment in the Austrian Bad Gleichenberg is Olga’s second purchase abroad. At first she chose between Miami and Berlin, but eventually stopped again in Austria. “At some point, I…

...

“I achieved my goal”: an interview with a Tranio client a year and a half after buying a profitable apartment in Budapest
In 2016, a lawyer from Kiev Roman, with the help of Tranio, bought a profitable apartment in Budapest - he told us about the search and purchase procedure in the…

...

How the size of the capital and the behavior of owners of foreign accounts: the study of Tranio and Adam Smith
Russia joined the agreement on the automatic exchange of financial information (Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement, MCAA), and at the end of December 2017 the OECD published a list of countries…

...